In a renal transplant patient with worsening renal function and biopsy showing basophilic intranuclear inclusions, which virus is most likely responsible?

Study for the Step 3 UWSA Exam with our challenging quiz. Prepare with detailed explanations for each question, ensuring you're well-equipped for success. Enhance your understanding and boost your exam confidence!

Multiple Choice

In a renal transplant patient with worsening renal function and biopsy showing basophilic intranuclear inclusions, which virus is most likely responsible?

Explanation:
Reactivation of BK virus in a kidney transplant patient under immunosuppression is a common cause of allograft dysfunction. BK is a polyomavirus that remains latent in renal tissue and can reactivate when immune control is reduced, leading to BK virus nephropathy with tubulointerstitial inflammation and tubular injury. The biopsy finding of basophilic intranuclear inclusions in renal tubular epithelial cells is a classic clue to BK virus infection, reflecting viral replication within the nucleus of those cells. Clinically this often presents as a rising creatinine without another clear etiology. Diagnosis is strengthened by detecting BK DNA in blood or urine by PCR and by the characteristic histology on biopsy. Management focuses on reducing immunosuppression to restore viral control; antiviral therapies exist but evidence is limited. Although CMV can affect transplant recipients as well, it typically shows different histologic features (owl’s eye intranuclear inclusions) and often presents with systemic symptoms or organ-specific disease rather than isolated nephropathy.

Reactivation of BK virus in a kidney transplant patient under immunosuppression is a common cause of allograft dysfunction. BK is a polyomavirus that remains latent in renal tissue and can reactivate when immune control is reduced, leading to BK virus nephropathy with tubulointerstitial inflammation and tubular injury. The biopsy finding of basophilic intranuclear inclusions in renal tubular epithelial cells is a classic clue to BK virus infection, reflecting viral replication within the nucleus of those cells. Clinically this often presents as a rising creatinine without another clear etiology. Diagnosis is strengthened by detecting BK DNA in blood or urine by PCR and by the characteristic histology on biopsy. Management focuses on reducing immunosuppression to restore viral control; antiviral therapies exist but evidence is limited. Although CMV can affect transplant recipients as well, it typically shows different histologic features (owl’s eye intranuclear inclusions) and often presents with systemic symptoms or organ-specific disease rather than isolated nephropathy.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy